World Cup 2026 · Interactive Pricer

Voros Match Engine

VOROS RATINGS · DIXON-COLES · 48 TEAMS

Asian handicap, win / draw / loss, and totals for World Cup 2026, built on Voros McCracken's two-parameter ratings. The one number Fogle and Elo can't give you.

⚠️

Read this first. This prices the 90-minute result of a group-stage match. It's not built for knockouts (extra time and penalties change everything) or dead rubbers (teams rest starters once qualified). Ratings reflect team strength, not lineups or injuries. Fair (no-vig) lines aren't edge until you de-vig the book's price. Use the de-vig tool below, and beat the closing line, not the opener.

The Engine

Price a match pick two teams

vs
-0.10
ρ lifts low-score draws (0-0, 1-1). More negative = more draw-heavy.

Win / Draw / Loss

Draw

Asian Handicap ladder

Cover probabilities from Team 1's side

Win = your bet wins, Push = stake returned, Loss = bet loses. Quarter lines (e.g. -0.75) split the stake. The pick'em line (fair odds near even) is highlighted.

Line (T1)Win %Push %Loss %Fair odds

De-vig & edge finder

Is it actually value? enter the book's prices

Type the sportsbook's American odds. The tool strips the vig (proportional method) and compares the market's true probability to Voros. Edge is the gap, never the raw fair line. Leave a field blank to skip it.

Model lenses

Voros line, with a correlation-aware reality check

Voros prices the line (it's the only model with a native draw). Fogle and Elo only confirm direction. They are not independent votes: Voros–Fogle r = 0.92, Voros–Elo r = 0.93 (77 to 87% shared variance). Treat agreement as one shared signal counted three times, not three confirmations.

All 72 group matches

Precomputed board click a header to sort, click a row to load it

Every group-stage fixture priced at the current ρ. This is the data the moneyline page consumes. Draw % and the tightest games (closest to a coin flip) are where AH-0 and draw-no-bet value tends to hide.

Match Site T1 win Draw T2 win xGoals AH-0 T1 O2.5

How it works & what to distrust

The engine (verified to machine precision against Voros's own sheet)

Each team carries a log-goal rating and a scale (an additive over/under dial). For a match:

logit = (rating1 - rating2) + 0.342455 × HFA
goal_share = 1 / (1 + e^(-logit))
λ_total = exp(0.758236 + 0.235143×|logit| + (scale1 + scale2) + 0.0094)
λ1 = λ_total × goal_share,  λ2 = λ_total × (1 - goal_share)

Two Poisson draws give the scoreline; a Dixon-Coles correction lifts the low-score draws (0-0, 1-1) that independent Poisson understates. Win/draw/loss, the handicap ladder, and totals all fall out of the resulting score grid. My re-implementation reproduces Voros's own logit and λ columns to machine precision across all 72 fixtures.

What to distrust (the gauntlet's surviving cautions)
  • ρ is uncalibrated. Without realized goal-margin data, ρ is a literature default. The draw and AH-0 prices, exactly the bets you'd target, carry real model uncertainty, which is why the ρ-band is shown.
  • The models are redundant. 0.92 to 0.93 correlation means "all three disagree with the market" is usually a shared blind spot, not three confirmations. The lens panel flags it but won't bless it.
  • Voros's edges sit on its thinnest data. Its biggest disagreements with consensus are CAF and AFC sides. Treat those as leads to chase down, not locks.
  • Squad / vintage. Ratings reflect team strength, not June 2026 lineups or injuries. Confirm form before betting.
  • Closing line. A fair-line edge is only an edge if it beats the de-vigged closing price.